United States
North America
Structured upgrade paths for Sybase ASE 12.5, 15.x, and intermediate releases to the current long-term supported version — with T-SQL compatibility analysis, parallel-run testing, and zero-downtime cutover.
SAP stopped patching older ASE versions years ago. Every month on an unsupported release is a month without security fixes, without vendor escalation paths, and with an ever-narrowing pool of engineers who know the version well.
| Version | Released | End of Mainstream Support | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sybase ASE 12.5 | 2001 | Dec 2009 | End of Life |
| Sybase ASE 15.0 | 2005 | Dec 2012 | End of Life |
| SAP ASE 15.5 | 2010 | Dec 2014 | End of Life |
| SAP ASE 15.7 | 2012 | Dec 2017 | End of Life |
| SAP ASE 16.0 SP00–SP02 | 2014 | Dec 2019 | End of Support |
| SAP ASE 16.0 SP03 | 2017 | Dec 2022 | End of Support |
| SAP ASE 16.0 SP04+ | 2020 | 2025+ | Active |
| SAP SQL Anywhere 17 | 2015 | 2027 | Active |
* Support dates are approximate and sourced from SAP's product availability matrix. Always verify current status with SAP before making upgrade decisions.
The migration is only as reliable as the preparation behind it. We address compatibility, validation, parity, and operational continuity as a single continuous scope of work.
Analyse T-SQL, stored procedures, datatypes, and deprecated features for compatibility with the target ASE version. A full written compatibility report before any migration work begins.
Test all stored procedures, triggers, and application queries against the target version in a cloned environment. Issues are resolved before staging is promoted to production.
Migrate tables, indexes, constraints, defaults, rules, and all schema objects with full parity verification. Every object is accounted for — nothing is assumed compatible by default.
Run source and target ASE in parallel, comparing query outputs and execution plans before cutover. Divergences are documented and resolved; cutover only happens when parity is confirmed.
Staged cutover using Sybase Replication Server for minimal production window impact. Rollback criteria are defined and tested before cutover is executed — not after.
Re-tune statistics, update device configurations, and validate the backup cycle on the new version. Performance baselines compared against pre-migration benchmarks.
Compatibility analysis before anything else. We produce a written report covering T-SQL patterns, datatype changes, and deprecated feature usage relative to your target ASE version — scope is defined before a single line of DDL is touched.
Staging mirrors production exactly. Same hardware spec, same data volumes, same ASE configuration parameters — every failure mode surfaces in staging, not in your production window.
Rollback criteria agreed before cutover. A named trigger condition — latency threshold, query error rate, replication lag ceiling — is documented upfront. The rollback initiates automatically, without a decision under pressure.
Each stage has defined entry and exit criteria. Work does not advance until the current stage is complete and signed off.
Full inventory of schema objects, stored procedures, T-SQL patterns, and application dependencies. Compatibility report against target ASE version with a prioritised remediation list before any environment work begins.
Clone production to staging. Apply the target ASE version. Run the full regression suite and resolve every incompatibility. The staging sign-off is the gate to any production activity — no exceptions.
Parallel-run via Replication Server or backup/restore depending on the agreed strategy. Cutover executed in the agreed maintenance window with rollback trigger defined, tested, and documented.
Statistics updated, execution plans reviewed against pre-migration baselines, backup cycle verified on the new version. 30-day post-upgrade support included — engineering access, not a helpdesk queue.
We use the native Sybase toolchain throughout — no abstraction layers that add fragility to an already complex migration.
Two recent ASE migration engagements — a version upgrade with a staged compatibility path, and a parallel-run validation that eliminated cutover risk on a business-critical platform.
No case studies found.
Let's Talk
Tell us what you are running today and where you need expert support.
"*" indicates required fields
Global Presence
Five global locations. One connected engineering team.
North America
Chennai · Coimbatore
Client services
Regional operations
Client services